WARNING! Note that highly deceptive forgeries of Helena's coins from Antioch also exist.
(1) forgery of ANTIOCH 75 (from International Association of Professional Numismatists "Bulletin on Counterfeits" 1990, vol. 15, no. 1);
(1a) forgery of ANTIOCH 75 (CGB Monnaies 21, lot 3638; 4.01 g, 19 mm);
(1/2) forgery of ANTIOCH 75 (Sol Numismatik XVIII, lot 503; 2.88 g, 20 mm; obv. fake type 1 with rev. fake type 2);
(1/2a) forgery of ANTIOCH 75 (Dom Aukcyjny Numimarket.pl eAuction 6, lot 265; 3.14 g, 19 mm;
(2) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (from International Association of Professional Numismatists "Bulletin on Counterfeits" 1990, vol. 15, no. 1);
(2a) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (CNG eAuction 241, lot 623; 3.33 g, 19 mm);
(2b) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (Naville Numismatics Timed Auction 3, lot 170; 3.89 g, 20 mm);
(2c) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (Münz Zentrum Rheinland auction 194, lot 998; 4.02 g, 20 mm);
(2d) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (Gabinet Numizmatyczny D. Marciniak auction 14, lot 8613; 3.41 g, 19.1-19.3 mm);
(2e) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (Nummitra auction 49, lot 296; 3.38 g, 19 mm);
(2f) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (Demeter Coin auction 34, lot 645; 2.84 g, 19 mm);
(2g) forgery of ANTIOCH 80 (InAsta E-Auction 116, lot 270; 3.39 g;
(3/1) forgery of ANTIOCH 82 (CNG eAuction 248, lot 422; 4.16 g, 20 mm; obv. fake type 3 with rev. fake type 1);
(3/1a) forgery of ANTIOCH 82 (Nomos Obolos webauction 9 - The Stoecklin Collection Part III, lot 789; 4.19 g, 20 mm);
(3/1b) forgery of ANTIOCH 82 (Hirsch auction 296, lot 2367);
(3/1c) forgery of ANTIOCH 82 (CNG eAuction 524, lot 662; 3.88 g, 20 mm).
To the same group belongs also Fausta's coin from Nicomedia:
(4) forgery of NICOMEDIA 131 (Nomos Obolos webauction 9 - The Stoecklin Collection Part III, lot 788; 3.62 g, 19 mm);
(4a) forgery of NICOMEDIA 131 (Roma Numismatics eSale 5, lot 885; 2.98 g, 18 mm);
(4b) forgery of NICOMEDIA 131 (Savoca Numismatik 81st Blue Auction, lot 1364; 2.75 g, 17 mm);
(4c) forgery of NICOMEDIA 131 (London Ancient Coins auction 23, lot 256; 3.57 g, 18 mm);
(4c) forgery of NICOMEDIA 131 (Hirsch auction 284, lot 3048; 3.57 g, 18 mm).
See also ANTIOCH 75, HELENA, UNLISTED OFFICINA I [FORGERY], ANTIOCH 76/75, FAUSTA, HYBRID [FORGERY] and NICOMEDIA 129/131, HELENA, HYBRID [FORGERY].
p. 696
ANTIOCH 107. Bust type is marked E4 (head with plain diadem, looking upwards) and should be B2 (head laur., looking upwards); like for ANTIOCH 106. See : ANTIOCH 107, CONSTANS, [CORRECTION].
p. 703
ALEXANDRIA 6. Misprint. Obv. legend for ALEXANDRIA 6 is: FL VALER CONSTANTINIVS P F AVG and should be: FL VALER CONSTANTINVS P F AVG.
p. 718
Corrigendum to page 529. THESSALONICA 220A is in fact identical with THESSALONICA 220 and therefore does not exist. See also THESSALONICA 220, CONSTANTIUS II, [CORRECTION].
p. 733
D N LICINI AVGVSTI. Page 444 omitted (SISCIA 160).
p. 742
LICINI AVG. 442 in line 2 from the bottom of the page should be listed under entry LICINI AVGVSTI on the next page.
p. 750
SECVRITAS REIPVBLICE. Description of this rev. type (minted for Helena) is slightly incorrect, here and nearly in the whole book. Securitas is raising robe with left hand, not right as Bruun continuously gives. In right hand she is holding branch pointing down. See for example CYZICUS 54.
Plate 1
PICTURE 17, referring to RIC VII LONDON 17 (p. 98), actually shows RIC VII LONDON 14 (p. 98) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 98).
Plate 2
PICTURE 49, referring to RIC VII LYONS 49 (p. 125), actually shows RIC VII LYONS 48 (p. 125) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 125).
Plate 6
PICTURE 196, referring to RIC VII ARLES 196 (p. 255), actually shows RIC VII ARLES 197 (p. 255) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 255).
Plate 10
PICTURE 170, referring to RIC VII TICINUM 170 (p. 381), actually shows RIC VII TICINUM 175 (p. 382) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 381).
Plate 11
PICTURE 39, referring to RIC VII AQUILEIA 39 (p. 399), actually shows RIC VII AQUILEIA 50 (p. 399) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 399-400) [Thanks to the collaboration of Tomasz Speier].
Plate 17
PICTURE 92, referring to RIC VII HERACLEA 92 (p. 553), actually shows RIC VII HERACLEA 90 (p. 553) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 553).
Plate 22
PICTURE 56, referring to RIC VII CYZICUS 56 (p. 553), actually shows RIC VII CYZICUS 55 (p. 652). The diadem is apparently a plain diadem type (ii), sub-type (b): "with crosses and annulets (with central dot) alternating, end-rosette same size as annulets" (p. 660). But note that the distinction between the plain diadem and the rosette diadem is sometimes arbitrary also in case of Cyzicene issues (cf. footnote 29 on p. 574).
Plate 22
PICTURE 72, referring to RIC VII CYZICUS 72 (p. 554), actually shows RIC VII CYZICUS 71 (p. 654) (see above: Corrigenda to p. 654 and Corrigenda to p. 88: BUST TYPES D3 and D4).